Objects of abandonment of the path of seeing

Divisions:

Possibilities of the conceptions: (by way of objects)

Apprehendeds but not Apprehenders: Adherence to forms and so forth as truly existing objects of utilisation གཟུགས་སོགས་ལ་ལོངས་སྤྱད་བྱར་བདེན་པར་ཞེན་པ།
(Not the latter because it is not an object-possessor)
Apprehenders but not Apprehendeds: Adherence to a single moment of consciousness as a truly existing utiliser ཤེས་པ་སྐད་ཅིག་གཅིག་ལ་ལོངས་སྤྱོད་པ་པོར་བདེན་པར་ཞེན་པ།
(Not the latter because it cannot be realised by ordinary beings' direct perception
སོ་སོ་སྐྱེ་བོའི་མངོན་སུམ་གྱིས་རྟོགས་མི་ནུས་པ།)
Both: A continuous consciousness རྒྱུན་དང་ལྡན་པའི་ཤེས་པ།
- Adherence to that as an object of utilisation is the conception of apprehendeds
- Adherence to that as a utiliser is the conception of apprehenders
Neither: Non-dual perfection of wisdom མངོན་གཉིས་སུ་མེད་པའི་ཤེར་ཕྱིན།
e.g. exalted knower of all aspects རྣམ་མཁྱེན།
Not an object of either conception because:
- Cannot be directly realised by ordinary beings' direct perception
- Does not exist in by ordinary beings' continua

Therefore, in this context (Vimuktasena's Illumination), this is in relation to ordinary beings:

Being an apprehended depends on being realised or not by ordinary beings' direct perception
e.g. five sense objects
Being an apprehender depends on existing in the continua of ordinary beings
e.g. a single moment of consciousness