Enter your search text in the box above

Select a result to preview



Correct sign illustrations

Divisions + Illustrations:

  1. Correct effect sign - Smoke exists (b/c correct sign + the predicate is its cause)
    1. Correct sign of result proving a direct cause - Smoke exists (b/c correct sign of result + proving existence of a direct cause)
    2. Correct sign of result proving a preceding cause - Smoke (b/c correct sign of result + proving preceding cause)
    3. Correct sign of result proving a general cause - functioning thing (for arising from c+c) (b/c correct sign of result + proving a general cause)
    4. Correct sign of result proving a specific cause - functioning thing (for possessing ooc) (b/c correct sign of result + proving a specific cause)
    5. Correct sign of result of extrapolating a causal property - present existence of molasses (b/c correct sign of result + proving a causal property)
  2. Correct nature sign - Product (b/c correct sign + one nature with predicate)
    1. An attributed correct sign of nature in the proof of that - arisen from exertion (b/c correct sign of nature + implying an agent)
    2. An unattributed correct sign of nature in the proof of that - functioning thing (b/c correct sign of nature + not implying an agent)
  3. Correct non-observation sign - Non-existence of valid cogniser observing meat-eater (b/c correct sign + negation)
    1. Correct sign of non-observation of the non-appearing - same (b/c correct sign of non-observation + suprasensory object)
      1. Correct sign of non-observation of the non-appearing related object in the proof of that - same (b/c correct sign of non-observation of the non-appearing + non-implicative negation)
        1. Correct sign of non-observation of a non-appearing cause - same (b/c correct sign of non-observation of the non-appearing related object + cause of subsequent cogniser)
        2. Correct sign of non-observation of a non-appearing pervader - non-observation by valid cognition of existence of meat-eater (b/c correct sign of non-observation of the non-appearing related object + pervader of being suitable to assert)
        3. Correct sign of non-observation of a non-appearing nature - non-observation by valid cognition of that subsequent cogniser (b/c correct sign of non-observation of the non-appearing related object + same nature as non-existence of that)
      2. Correct sign of observation of the non-appearing contradictory object in the proof of that - existence (b/c correct sign of non-observation + either implicative negation or positive phenomenon)
    2. Correct sign of non-observation of that suitable to appear - product (for sound not being permanent) (b/c correct sign of non-observation + not suprasensory object)
      1. Correct sign of non-observation of the related object that is suitable to appear - non-existence of fire (b/c correct sign of non-observation of that suitable to appear + non-implicative negation)
        1. Correct sign of non-observation of a cause that is suitable to appear - same (b/c correct sign of non-observation of the related object + fire is the cause of smoke)
        2. Correct sign of non-observation of a pervader that is suitable to appear - non-existence of trees (b/c correct sign of non-observation of the related object + trees pervade Ashoka trees)
        3. Correct sign of non-observation of a nature that is suitable to appear - non-observation by valid cognition of vase (b/c correct sign of non-observation of the related object + same nature as non-existence of vase)
        4. Correct sign of non-observation of a direct result that is suitable to appear - non-existence of the direct result of smoke (b/c correct sign of non-observation of the related object + immediately preceded by direct cause, i.e. fire)
      2. Correct sign of observation of the contradictory object that is suitable to appear - product (for sound not being permanent) (b/c correct sign of non-observation of that suitable to appear + either implicative negation or positive phenomenon)
        1. Correct sign of observation of the contradictory object that is suitable to appear that relates via a non-simultaneous abiding contradiction - the functioning thing that is pervasively covered with a great powerful fire (b/c correct sign of observation of the contradictory object + contradictory with continuous coldness by way of not abiding simultaneously)
          1. Correct sign of observation of a nature contradictory with a nature - same
          2. Correct sign of observation of a nature contradictory with a cause - same (for goosebumps)
          3. Correct sign of observation of a nature contradictory with a pervader - same (for feeling of snow)
          4. Correct sign of observation of a result contradictory with a nature - billowing smoke (for coldness)
          5. Correct sign of observation of a result contradictory with a cause - billowing smoke (for goosebumps)
        2. Correct sign of observation of the contradictory object that is suitable to appear that relates via a mutually negating contradiction - product (for sound not being permanent) (b/c correct sign of observation of the contradictory object + not contradictory with permanent by way of not abiding simultaneously, because it is not a different substance from permanent)

Up a level: Tarig